Da voenit}2y,
int ee
Whe ae
ms yy : RER POTRACRIT AO TLIC RAVI
be \MU// 7 DL PAINT Wily | wr bP e t
fey AN Sn caypeut exe nehtiick ERB
I 2 gee RBOARN FOR CORRECTION OF MAVAL RECORDS
ca
)
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR9659-14
9 Oct 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
8 October 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser
N130C1/14U1140 dated 27 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
s : = a
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient tec
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice In
thie connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Dociret Wo. NES
for a correction of an otficial
Consegquentiy, when applying naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
vt
HELE F a ft 7
* KUBERT 0. V Weis
Fxecutive Director
CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U1140 ee eae
Enclosure:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2690 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U0041 dated 10 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ef probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2478 14
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8455 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s dependents exercised the “layover option”, vice Consecutive Overseas Tour (COT) leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8008 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to correct orders from Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders to Active Duty for Training (ADT) Orders. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Ivins and Mr. Spain, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 3014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4696 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1070 dated > a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8004 14
NR8004-14 23 Oct 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change Petitioner’s Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders to Active Duty for Training (ADT) orders. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2628 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1228 dated 18 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2628-14 on of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a correcti demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1916 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bJCc Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1218 dated 17 September 2014, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.